The liquidator is an insolvency professional on whom all the powers of the Board of Directors, key managerial personnel, and the partners, as applicable, of the Corporate Debtor are vested by the Adjudicating Authority upon Liquidation order being passed under section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Thursday, 30 July 2020
Wednesday, 29 July 2020
Are you puzzled with due date of Q1 TDS statement of Financial Year 2020-21.
The Govt. vide the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 read with Notification No. 35 /2020, dated 24-06-2020 has extended various due dates of Income-tax compliances. It includes the extension of due dates for filing of Income-tax Returns for the Assessment Year 2019-20 and 2020-21, TDS/TCS statement of the 4th quarter of Financial Year 2019-20, etc.
Tuesday, 28 July 2020
Computation of profit or loss from sale of business property in an asset block
Buy back - is still a tax efficient tool?
Buy-Back is one of the important provisions in the Companies Act, 2013, which enables a company to purchase its own shares. Amongst other host of reasons, a program of buy-back is resorted to by a company to distribute surplus cash to its shareholders or to even provide investors an opportunity to exit from their investment, especially in case of unlisted/private companies.
Sunday, 26 July 2020
Sunset Clause for SEZ?
A Special Economic Zone (SEZ) refers to a limited geographical region set up by the government to incentivize fresh foreign direct investment (FDI) and enjoys relaxed economic laws. In the year 2000, the government had set a target of creating 100 million jobs and of achieving 25% of the country’s GDP from manufacturing by the year end 2022. Thus, the government had set forth a SEZ policy as a part of it s EXIM policy.
Assessment of Non-Existing Entity or Dead Person
1. The controversy with respect to the validity of the assessment in the hands of non-existing entity has been recently settled in favour of the Assessee by Hon’ble Supreme Court by passing a speaking order on the subject matter in the case of PCIT v. Maruti Suzuki India Limited, (2019) (SC).
ROC (ADJUDICATION) UNDER COMPANIES ACT 2013
This Article is an primitive attempt to highlight the procedural status of Adjudication before Registrar of Companies. At the threshold, it is imperative to note that the Registrar of Companies is an classic case of studying administrative law. Largely ROC performs three kind of functions namely:-
Monday, 20 July 2020
The new lower Income tax rate is just an eyewash.
In February 2020, when
the Finance Minister of India announced the reduction in Income tax rates of
Individuals & HUF by the introduction of section 115BAC, the
individual taxpayers assume that this new section will reduce their tax burden
from the financial year 2020-21. However, when a fine print of the law was
published, this taxpayer was confused as to how there is a reduction in their
tax cost from the new lower tax rate.
The benefit of the
reduced tax rates is available only when the taxpayer forgoes all their
exemptions & deductions. These exemptions & deductions are most
commonly available deductions and the taxpayer actually has nothing to do extra
to get all these exemptions & deductions. For example, standard deductions
of Rs.50,000/-, deductions of Rs. 150,000/- under section 80C which mainly
includes mandatory payment like, provident fund, school fees, Life Insurance,
Home loan repayment etc, deductions for health insurance, House rent allowance
for rent paid to the landlord, Interest on loan for self-occupied residence,
etc. Therefore it is very unlikely that taxpayers who are availing all
these exemptions and deductions will get benefit from the new tax rate.
Further, Individual
taxpayers have the choice to select between old and new tax rates and hence to
do the correct selection, the taxpayer is required to first compute correct tax
liability under both the tax rates and then only can decide which is beneficial
to him. Thus, the process of computing income tax liability for individual
taxpayers is more stressful & cumbersome.
Also, the salaried
individual taxpayers who are subject to TDS, are required to inform their
employer at the beginning of the year about their preference of tax rates and
there is no option to change their preference during the financial year. Thus,
these salaried taxpayers have been imposed with an additional burden to be
extra cautious while intimating the employer regarding availing the option of
tax rates. The new tax rates are only beneficial to the taxpayer who
doesn’t have any option to claim any deductions or exemptions.
Thus, complexities of
exercising and evaluating the option itself make the change onerous for the
taxpayer. Further, the scope of availing the exemptions and deductions are
vast, it’s very unlikely that taxpayers will select a new tax rate and hence it
can be concluded that new tax rate is just an eyewash.
Friday, 17 July 2020
Understanding Crypto-assets
The instant contest over the digital assets is effectively between accountholders with holding a positive coin balance; and the shareholders and creditors of Cryptopia. The question before the Court was that how the liquidators should distribute the digital assets? The creditors' position is that the digital assets, along with Cryptopia's other remaining assets should be distributed on a pari passu basis, treating all accountholders and other unsecured creditors equally. However, the accountholders were arguing that digital assets belong to them and, the same are held by Cryptopia in trust for the accountholders.
GST ON WORKS CONTRACTS AND REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS
DEFINITION
- Section 2(119) of CGST ACT, 2017 provides as follows:
“Works
Contract” means a contract for:
building, construction, fabrication ,
completion, erection, installation, fitting
out, improvement, modification, repair, maintenance, renovation, alteration or
commissioning, of any immovable property
wherein transfer of property in
goods (whether as goods or in some other form) is involved in the execution of such contract.
Understanding re-domiciliation
Introduction :
Much in the way that a
company can change its registered office/registered agent within the same
jurisdiction, it can also “move” to a new jurisdiction. Corporate
re-domiciliation is the process by which a company moves its ‘domicile’ (or
place of incorporation) from one jurisdiction to another by changing the
country under whose laws it is registered or incorporated, whilst maintaining
the same legal identity. The ease with which re-domiciliation may take place
has increased in recent years.
Further, not all countries allow re-domiciliation. Those that do, tend to be Commonwealth “common Law” (as opposed to Civil law jurisdictions). Notable exceptions are Cyprus, Austria, Hungary, Latvia, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Mauritius, BVI, Delaware & Ireland which are civil law but do permit re-domiciliation and conversely UK, Singapore, Hong Kong which are common law but do not generally allow re-domiciliation in or out. Notably, the Indian corporate laws currently do not permit either inbound or outbound re-domiciliation.
Monday, 13 July 2020
Imp Verdict On S. 147 Reopening To Tax Bogus Capital Gains (Penny Stocks)
S. 147 Reopening for bogus capital gains from penny stocks: The Dept's argument that though the assessee disclosed details of the transactions pertaining to purchase and sale of shares, it did not disclose the real colour / true character of the transactions and, therefore, did not make a full and true disclosure of all material facts which was also overlooked by the AO, is not correct. The assessee disclosed the primary facts to the AO & also explained the queries put by the AO. It cannot be said that the assessee did not disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment
Aspects to be considered before filing GST Returns for September 2020
In view of the
specific provisions of the GST law, following aspects need to be finalized
before furnishing the returns for the month of September 2020:
Sunday, 12 July 2020
GST on WHT paid u/s 195 - Query resolved.
The below opinion is in respect of applicability of
GST on withholding tax payable under section 195 of the Income tax act,
1961.
Given below the extract of GST law relevant for the discussion & opinion to be formed.
Saturday, 11 July 2020
GST on Factoring Arrangements
Receivables constitute a significant portion of current assets of a firm. But, for investment in receivables, a firm has to incur certain costs such as costs of financing receivables and costs of collection from receivables. Further, there is a risk of bad debts also. It is, therefore, very essential to have a proper control and management of receivables. In India, transfer of receivables arising out of sale or loan transactions takes place quite frequently. In such a case, a firm may avail the services of specialized institutions engaged in receivables management, called factoring firms.
Tax Withholding by Non-residents
Tax Withholding by Non-residents on Payments to
Residents - Controversy Reignited!
Background
Whether a non-resident is also required to comply with the tax withholding obligations enshrined under Indian tax law has been a long-standing controversy. The issue arose because withholding tax provisions, such as Section 194J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) casts as obligation to withhold taxes on “any person responsible” for making the prescribed payments to a resident. Further, with no express or implied exemption or exclusion being provided for non-resident payers, the provisions appear to include them within the ambit and fasten withholding tax obligations upon non-residents responsible for making prescribed payments to residents in India.
Director Disqualification
Introduction
After the implementation of Companies Act, 2013, Ministry of Corporate Affairs have been knocking down the directors by the virtue of Section 164. Aggrieved directors have been knocking the doors of various High Courts and even the Apex Court of the country. The bone of contention in Section 164 lies in regards to its implementation, whether the section is retrospective or prospective in nature. There have been various judicial pronouncements in regards to the same, but various courts tend to differ as to applicability should be prospective or retrospective. Under the old regime, Section 274 (1) (g) of Companies Act 1956, which deals with disqualification of directors, has reigned over public companies. However, the corresponding provision under the new regime, Section 164 (2) of the Act 2013 extended its arms to engulf both private and public companies. It seems Directors are victimized u/s-164(2) for default of corporate, disregarding the facts of separate legal entities attributing a Single Sweep u/s 164 for the disqualification of directors.
Tuesday, 7 July 2020
Know the changes introduced in new TDS Returns
The Finance Act, 2020 has made several changes to the Chapter-XVII (Collection and Recovery of Tax). Twenty-Five Sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961 have been impacted due to the Finance Act, 2020 either by way of amendment to the existing provision or by insertion of new provisions for deduction or collection of tax. E- Commerce operators, tour operators, Mutual Funds, domestic companies and authorized dealers have been entrusted with obligations of deduction or collection of tax at source from certain transactions. To incorporate the impact of recent changes, the CBDT has notified the amendment to Rule 31A and Annexure to Form 26Q and Form 27Q vide Income-tax (16th Amendment Rule), 20201.
GST on ROC Filing Fee paid by companies/LLPs
Introduction
The
law relating to companies is laid down in Companies
Act, 2013 and the rules made thereunder and the compliance required
under the Corporate Law is under the jurisdiction of Registrar of Companies
(ROC) under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). After the initial
registration, there are various other statutory compliances that are required
to be complied by the companies such as filing
of Annual Returns
and AGM, appointment and resignation of Directors, appointment and resignation of Auditors, change in Registered Office, change in Authorized Share Capital and so
on. While filing
said the returns
and documents in the MCA portal, the companies have to remit a prescribed fee.
Right from the Service Tax regime, levy of tax on the ROC filing fee has been a contentious issue. Even under the GST regime, the Department is issuing show cause notices to corporate taxpayers across the country demanding GST on ROC filing fee on reverse charge basis. Many companies have not paid GST on ROC filing fee and soon the issue will come up for judicial scrutiny. An attempt has been made in this article to understand the nuances in this issue in legal as well as judicial backdrop.
Monday, 6 July 2020
Supplies to SEZ Under GST: Rules and Provisions
Sunday, 5 July 2020
Applicability of TAX AUDIT for Financial Year 2019‐20 (A.Y.2020‐21)
Business
Assessee (INDI / HUF / Firm)
1st condition 2nd Condition 3rd
Condition
Turnover |
Net Profit > 8% or 6%
of turnover (u/s 44AD) |
All cash receipts > 5%
of total Receipts |
All cash payment > 5% of total
payments |
Audit U/s |
* 6% net profit incase of amount of total turnover
or gross receipts received through banking channel / digital means |
||||
|
||||
Upto 1 Crore |
No |
NA |
NA |
Yes 44AD(e) |
Yes |
NA |
NA |
No |
|
|
||||
1‐2 crore |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes 44AB(a) |
|
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes 44AB(a) |
|
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes 44AB(a) |
|
No |
Irrelevant |
Irrelevant |
Yes 44AB(a) |
|
|
||||
2 ‐ 5 crore |
NA |
No |
No |
No |
NA |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes 44AB(a) |
|
NA |
Yes |
No |
Yes 44AB(a) |
|
NA |
No |
Yes |
Yes 44AB(a) |
|
|
||||
More than 5 Crore |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Yes 44AB(a) |
Recommendations of 55th GST council meeting | 21 December 2024
Summary of the relevant updates is provided below for ease of your reference: A) Proposals relating to GST law, Compliances an...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...