THE issue before the Bench is - Whether when revised return includes an expenditure disallowable u/s 37(1) it would automatically follow that inaccurate particulars were furnished even in originally filed return. YES is the verdict.
Facts of the case
The assessee is a sugar manufacturing company. After the assessee had filed its return, the assessment u/s 143(3) was completed showing a total income of Rs. 5,91,48,819/- and tax was charged u/s 115JB. Subsequently, the assessee filed a revised return showing a total income of