Wednesday, 8 February 2012

s. 194H TDS: In absence of principal-agent relationship, payment, though called “commission”, not covered

Kotak Securities Limited vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

The assessee obtained a bank guarantee and paid ‘bank guarantee commission’. The AO & CIT (A) took the view that since the payment was characterized as “commission” it fell within the ambit of s. 194H and the assessee ought to have deducted TDS. The assessee was held liable as assessee-in-default u/s 201. On appeal by the assessee, HELD reversing the AO & CIT (A):

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was once
a leisure account it. Glance complicated to far brought agreeable
from you! However, how could we communicate?
Stop by my site ; how to get rid of swollen ankles

Can GST Under RCM Not Charged and Paid from FY 2017-18 to October 2024 be Settled in FY 2024-25?

 In a recent and significant update to GST regulations, registered persons in India can now clear unpaid Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) liab...