Wednesday, February 8, 2012

s. 194H TDS: In absence of principal-agent relationship, payment, though called “commission”, not covered

Kotak Securities Limited vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

The assessee obtained a bank guarantee and paid ‘bank guarantee commission’. The AO & CIT (A) took the view that since the payment was characterized as “commission” it fell within the ambit of s. 194H and the assessee ought to have deducted TDS. The assessee was held liable as assessee-in-default u/s 201. On appeal by the assessee, HELD reversing the AO & CIT (A):

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was once
a leisure account it. Glance complicated to far brought agreeable
from you! However, how could we communicate?
Stop by my site ; how to get rid of swollen ankles

Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment

  This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...