In this case, the trustees were the parents and the beneficiaries were their two daughters. Subsequently, the parents were added as additional beneficiaries, when the original beneficiaries relinquished their rights. The said trust was dissolved and the assets were equally distributed among the parents.
The AO made addition of amount received by parents to their total income. On appeal, CIT(A) held that the amount received by parents would be taxable as gift under Sec. 56(2)(v), on following grounds:
a) Neither there was specific transfer nor gift by both the daughters to their parents;
b) As the sum was received without consideration and the said trust did not fall within the ambit of the word "Relative".
On further appeal, the Tribunal held that undisputedly, the assessee had received the amount on dissolution of trust in the capacity of beneficiaries. Therefore, the amount received by the parents could not be termed as amount received by the beneficiaries "without consideration". Therefore, addition made by AO was deleted and assessee's claim has been allowed - ASHOK C. PRATAP v. ACIT[2012] 23 taxmann.com 347 (Mumbai - Trib.)
|
Thursday, 26 July 2012
Amount received by trustee-cum-beneficiary on dissolution of trust is not 'gift' to be taxed under sec. 56
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GAAR Not Applicable to Genuine Capital Market Transactions: Telangana High Court
In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court held that General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) cannot be invoked merely because a transacti...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment