Tuesday, 21 August 2012

Mere filing of Return of Income disbars an advance ruling application

Netapp BV vs. The AAR (Delhi High Court)



For AY 2009-10, the assessee filed a return on income u/s 139(1) on 31.3.2010. On 17.06.2010, it filed an application before the AAR seeking a ruling in respect of the transactions that had been entered into in that year. The AAR rejected the application on the ground that as the assessee had filed a ROI, the questions raised in the application were “already pending” before an income-tax authority and so the application was not maintainable under the proviso to s. 245R(2). The assessee filed a Writ petition contending that (a) the mere filing of a ROI did not mean that all possible questions were “pending” if the AO had not raised the issue and (b) as the AAR had in the past admitted applications even though ROIs were filed, it could not change its stand. HELD dismissing the Petition:

No comments:

Summary of the Input Service Distributor (ISD) Mandate

The document provides an FAQ-style overview of the Input Service Distributor (ISD) mechanism, which will become mandatory under GST regulat...