HC sets
aside CESTAT's order pertaining to deletion of penalty on assessee for
mis-declaration of goods, upholds penalty u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962
(Act), while setting aside penalty u/s 114A; Agreeing with CESTAT, sets aside
interest demand since show cause notice (SCN) does not mention about Section 28
of Customs Act, and also does not mention as to what provisions of law the
interest was sought to be recovered although order confirms interest u/s
Section 28AB Act; Further states that, even if it is considered that demand
arises out of finalization of provisional assessment u/s 18, it is settled by
judicial pronouncements that no interest is recoverable on finalization of
provisional assessments made prior to July 13, 2007; Opines that, penalty
u/s 114A is not leviable since SCN did not mention anything about Section 28
and wording of Section 114A makes it expressly clear that penalty under said
Section is attracted when liability to pay duty or interest is determined u/s
28; However, distinguishing case of Care Foundation and Amrit Foods from
present case, states in present case, SCN invokes both Section 114A and 112,
and given that, both penal provisions are invoked, question of deleting penalty
could not have arisen : Delhi HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarifying the manner of gra...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Kerala High Court (HC) 1 upholding the validity of GST notifications 2 extending the t...
No comments:
Post a Comment