Mumbai ITAT allows
deduction u/s. 37 to Zee Entertainment (‘assessee’) with respect
to write off of advance given to BCCI, rejects Revenue's stand that it
represents a capital loss as it is in relation to acquisition of media
rights (which is a capital asset); Assessee acquired media rights from
BCCI on payment of US $ 17.5 million, out of which US$ 10 million was adjusted
against two matches played and the balance was kept as deposit (to be adjusted
against last series), however, owing to dispute, the contract was terminated
and the deposit was forfeited by BCCI during relevant AY 2008-09; ITAT holds
that the agreement with BCCI for acquiring the media rights was pursuant to
assessee’s normal business activity (of broadcasting and distribution of
TV programmes) and US$ 10 million which was adjusted in earlier year was
offered to tax by assessee; Further rejects Revenue’s stand that since the
assessee filed a legal case for recovery and also initiated arbitration
proceedings, it could not be said that the loss had actually crystallized
during relevant AY, similarly, rejects Revenue’s submission that write-off was
premature as assessee did not fully explore the possibility of its recovery;
ITAT remarks that “it is the judgement of the assessee as a businessman.”,
notes that despite arbitration proceedings, as assessee did not visualize any
sign of recovery, it wrote-off the forfeited amount and claimed deduction:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarifying the manner of gra...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Kerala High Court (HC) 1 upholding the validity of GST notifications 2 extending the t...
No comments:
Post a Comment