Goods and Services Tax or GST is made simple compared to earlier
indirect tax laws. The confusion which we had earlier is very specifically
articulated by government regarding reimbursements of expenses incurred at the
time of provision of services.
Expenses incurred by service provider acting as a PURE AGENT shall
be excluded from value of supply if some specified conditions are fulfilled.
It should be noted that you cannot exclude expenses incurred on behalf
of recipient of service unless you satisfy the conditions specified.
Rule 7 of the valuation rules issued in public domain is the
applicable rule to ascertain whether expenses incurred by service provider
should be excluded or not
The conditions which should be satisfied before excluding reimbursements
are:
- The
supplier acts as a pure agent of the recipient of the supply, when he
makes payment to the third party for the services procured as the contract
for supply made by third party is between third party and the recipient of
supply;
- The
recipient of supply uses the services so procured by the supplier service
provider in his capacity as pure agent of the recipient of supply;
- The
recipient of supply is liable to make payment to the third party;
- The
recipient of supply authorises the supplier to make payment on his behalf;
- The
recipient of supply knows that the services for which payment has been
made by the supplier shall be provided by the third party;
- The
payment made by the supplier on behalf of the recipient of supply has been
separately indicated in the invoice issued by the supplier to the
recipient of service;
- The
supplier recovers from the recipient of supply only such amount as has
been paid by him to the third party; and
- The
services procured by the supplier from the third party as a pure agent of
the recipient of supply are in addition to the supply he provides on his
own account.
Explanation . - For the purposes of this rule, “pure agent” means
a person who -
- Enters
into a contractual agreement with the recipient of supply to act as his
pure agent to incur expenditure or costs in the course of supply of goods
or services or both;
- Neither
intends to hold nor holds any title to the goods or services or both so
procured or provided as pure agent of the recipient of supply;
- Does
not use for his own interest such goods or services so procured; and
- Receives
only the actual amount incurred to procure such goods or services.
Which expenses can
be claimed as reimbursements and excluded from value of supply/sale/service?
You must have doubts whether expenses listed below can be claimed as
reimbursements and be excluded from value of supply.
- Expenses
such conveyance, transportation, food, team lunch,
- Payment
made to government departments such as ROC, Income Tax, GST etc.,
- Goods/materials
purchased on behalf of client/customer,
- Other
expenses incurred on behalf of client/customers.
The first condition is that supplier of service should act as a Pure
Agent of his client/customer. If you are not providing services as a pure agent
then you can not deduct expenses incurred on behalf of customer/client from
value of supply of services.
You can deduct only those payments which were supposed to be made by
your customer and parties involved in transaction knew the fact that it is your
customer who is supposed to make payment.
Your customer should have authorised you to make payments on his behalf
and you should:
- Specify
this amount separately in invoice,
- Recover
from client only actual amount paid,
- The
payment are in addition to other services you provide to your client.
- Not
hold title of goods or services procured on behalf of your client,
- Not
use goods or services for your personal use,
Let us understand this rule with an example.
We will take an example of professional services provided by CA, CS or
Lawyers. Professionals such as Chartered Accountants sometime have to make
payment on behalf of their clients. Take an example, of a CA who provides
service of LLP Registration.
CA charges client his professional fee along with expenses incurred in
form of payment to ROC. In this case CA acts as a pure agent of his client.
If fee of providing services was Rs. 15,000 and ROC expenses incurred
are Rs. 5,000.
CA need to charge tax only on Rs. 15,000 and not Rs. 5,000 which were
paid in discharge of his duty as a Pure Agent.
Here things to be noted are that, the payments to ROC were made on
behalf of service recipient and CA acted as a pure agent between his client and
ROC. Service received from ROC by making payment were not used by CA but by his
client to get the name approval and registration.
No comments:
Post a Comment