Ahmedabad ITAT invokes
Explanation 1 to Sec. 37(1), disallows cost of production of goods incurred by
assessee (manufacturer of pan masala) which were found to containing magnesium
carbonate, a known carcinogenic substance, in excess of permissible limits;
ITAT notes that in terms of a court order under the Prevention of
Food Adulteration Act, the goods had to be destroyed, thus holds that
expenditure for making this product was something "prohibited by
law"; Observes that "Pan masala is a controversial product and,
even when it is manufactured within the permissible legal norms, it is
considered to be responsible for oral cancer and other severe ill effects
on health. In the present case, the assessee has gone even further against
the public interests", thus holds expenditure on manufacturing such
products whether deliberately or inadvertently, cannot be allowed as deduction;
Rejects assessee’s contention that no penalty, etc. was imposed on it, observes
that "... as long as the expenditure is incurred for a
purpose which is prohibited by law, it is immaterial whether the said act
of the assessee constitutes an offence or not"; Further remarks
that "What is even more disturbing is the indifferent attitude
to the assessee to the possible damage their products could have caused,
and, without any remorse or regret in his conduct, claim business
deduction of expenses incurred ...":ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarifying the manner of gra...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Kerala High Court (HC) 1 upholding the validity of GST notifications 2 extending the t...
No comments:
Post a Comment