HC
holds that Joint Commissioner (Executive) (JC) is empowered to exercise
revisional powers comprised under Section 10B of U.P. Trade Tax Act 1948;
Rejects assessee’s plea that no notification has been issued by State
Government conferring such authority, acts and decisions of JC cannot be
validated or saved by application of “de facto” doctrine, hence exercise of
power by JC was invalid, liable to be viewed as a mere usurper of office;
Observes, a careful reading of Section 10B clearly establish that initially the
provision empowered the Commissioner or such other officer not below the rank
of Deputy Commissioner to exercise powers of revision and later words “Deputy
Commissioner” was substituted by words “Joint Commissioner”; States, fact that
Commissioner did not require separate authorisation by State Government or a
notification/authorization is evident from a plain construct of Section 10B
and once Section 2(b) mandates recognition and inclusion of Joint Commissioner
in expression “Commissioner”, there is, no requirement of separate
authorisation/notification of conferment of such authority; Remarks, “The
classification or the description of different categories in the Rules framed
under the 1948 Act clearly can neither control nor be determinative of the
authority which may exercise powers under Section 10B”, accordingly, dismisses
assessee’s revision petitions : Allahabad HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarifying the manner of gra...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Kerala High Court (HC) 1 upholding the validity of GST notifications 2 extending the t...
No comments:
Post a Comment