Delhi ITAT grants deduction
for provision in respect of price reduction on set top boxes for subject AY
2007-08, notes that price reduction was crystallized after March 31st of
relevant year but before the finalization of financial statements; During
relevant AY, assessee company had sold set top boxes to Tata Sky Ltd. at the
price agreed as per the MOU dated January, 2006, however, owing to reduction in
duties announced by Union Budget w.e.f. March 1, 2007, there was a retrospective
reduction in the price as agreed between the parties vide letter dated August,
2007; Rejects Revenue’s stand that post facto adjustment to sales receipt
cannot be accepted since price reduction was crystallized after the closure of
the relevant year; ITAT observes that the provision for price reduction
pertained to the set top boxes sold during relevant year, notes that though the
exact price reduction happened post 31st March, 2007, it was in principle
agreed before March 31st (i.e. at the time of Union budget); Further in view of
AS-4 and mercantile system of accounting followed by assessee, ITAT holds that
costs directly associated with the revenue recognized during the relevant
period, irrespective of whether the money paid or not, have to be considered,
lastly clarifies that if the deduction is not allowed in subject AY, the same
has to be allowed in subsequent AY:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarifying the manner of gra...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Kerala High Court (HC) 1 upholding the validity of GST notifications 2 extending the t...
No comments:
Post a Comment