Delhi ITAT upholds CIT(A)’s
order disallowing a portion of the conference expenses relating to amount spent
on party and dinner, media event, purchase of expensive watches, jackets,
T-shirts, etc. by assessee (a Law firm) during AY 2010-11; Regarding expenses
on distribution of T-shirts, caps and jackets having assessee firm’s logo on
annual day celebration, ITAT remarks that“nothing is brought on record as how
the distribution of the merchandise among the counsels has served the business
purpose of the assessee firm, which is firm of the Advocates.”, further notes
no evidence of distribution was submitted; Likewise, for dinner / video
coverage expenses in relation to a party hosted to celebrate assessee-firm’s
achievements in which all clients and counsels of the firm along with various
dignitaries were invited, ITAT states that, “The assessee has not brought on
record anything to support that the dinner hosted was for furtherance of the
business interest.”; Also, ITAT disallows sponsorship fee paid by assessee for
the event “PEI India Forum” for enhancing its visibility and recognition, holds
the same was in violation of the Bar Council rules [whereby Indian Law firms
are not allowed to advertise their practice in the market] , thereby triggering
Explanation 1 to Sec. 37; With respect to the expensive watches distributed as
rewards to two employees for their exceptional work, ITAT observes that assessee
did not provide any rationale of watches distribution to only two such
employees:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarifying the manner of gra...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Kerala High Court (HC) 1 upholding the validity of GST notifications 2 extending the t...
No comments:
Post a Comment