In a relief to Urban Ladder Home Décor Solutions, the Bangalore ITAT ruled that Payments made for online advertising and marketing to non-resident payees such as Facebook, Amazon Web Services (AWS) for advertising, marketing does not tantamount to payment of ‘Royalty’ under the relevant tax treaties.
ITAT relying on the SC’s dictum in ‘Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited’ held that beneficial DTAA provisions are to be considered for determining the taxability of income. On perusal of agreements with the non-resident payees, ITAT observed that mere usage of facility provided by Facebook or Rocket Science does not render the payment as ‘Royalty’, as copyright attached to the facility is not parted with. In the case of AWS, the payment is made only for using information technology infrastructure facilities on a rental basis. Hence the question of transferring the copyright over those facilities does not arise at all. Thereby, concluding that payments made to non-residents do not give rise to any income chargeable in India, and thus there was no requirement to deduct tax at source u/s 195. The judgement brings with it good tidings for the non-resident recipient companies, as erstwhile it was becoming challenging for the companies to claim credit in their home country, if tax was perceived as wrongly withheld in the source country (in this case India). The ruling would also go a long way in reinstating the foreign investors’ confidence in the taxation & legislative prowess of the country.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarifying the manner of gra...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Kerala High Court (HC) 1 upholding the validity of GST notifications 2 extending the t...
1 comment:
Allowability can be challenged for non deduction. Option is to apply equalization levy.
Post a Comment