Monday, 26 March 2012

In remand, s. 14A disallowance cannot exceed original disallowance

CIT vs. Machino Plastic Ltd (Delhi High Court)


The AO made a disallowance u/s 14A of Rs. 45 Lakhs on the ground that the assessee had not been able to segregate expenses relating to earning of dividend income and that borrowed funds had been used to fund the investments. The CIT (A) reduced the quantum of disallowance & the department accepted that. In the assessee’s appeal, the Tribunal totally deleted the disallowance. On appeal by the department, HELD:

No comments:

Interest on Foreign Currency Loan & Corresponding Forex Loss for Strategic Share Acquisition Held Deductible as Revenue Expenditure

  The tax treatment of interest on funds borrowed to acquire shares hinges on a single, crucial distinction: the   purpose   behind the acqu...