Tuesday, April 17, 2012

CIT vs. Hariprasad Bhojnagarwala (Gujarat High Court – Full Bench)

S. 23(2): A HUF is “owner occupying house for own residence”

The assessee, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), claimed deduction u/s 23(2). The AO & CIT (A) took the view the view that as s. 23(2) applied to “a house or part of a house in the occupation of the owner for the purposes of his own residence“, a HUF was not eligible. The Tribunal took a contrary view and allowed the assessee’s claim. In view of the apparent conflict amongst various High Courts, the matter was referred to a Full Bench:

No comments:

Deferred Customs Duty for Manufacturers: EMI Scheme Takes Effect from 1 April 2026

  In a significant move to ease working capital pressures for manufacturers, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), vide Ci...