CESTAT allows assessee’s
appeal, holds rejection of declaration filed under Service Tax Voluntary
Compliance Encouragement Scheme (VCES) on ground of mis-classification of
services as unsustainable; Notes that, while assessee categorised activity of
construction of residential and commercial complexes under 'construction of
complex service' and claimed abatement benefit under Notification No. 26/2012,
Revenue sought to disregard the declaration and classify said activity as
‘works contract service’ on ground that same were so disclosed for VAT
assessment purpose; Remarks, “(VCES) was framed by the Government with the
intention of encouraging voluntary compliance and payment of service tax” and
“declarations made under such scheme were to be accepted, by and large”;
Observes, total amount of consideration received has not been found to be
different from what was declared and Revenue has not produced any contract or
document indicating that assessee did not make full declaration of service tax
liability for the disputed period; Further, taking note of assessee's
contention that definition of works contract service under VAT law and Finance
Act, 1994, is different, holds that, different interpretation on classification
of services does not tantamount to substantial misdeclaration : Bangalore
CESTAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment