Delhi Govt. constitutes
“Refund Approval Committee” chaired by senior most Special Commissioner along
with Special Commissioners & Controller of Accounts as members and Zonal
In-charge as member secretary, to grant approval in case of refund of SGST,
CGST, IGST and Cess above Rs. 50 lakhs under DGST / CGST Act; Directs all Asst.
Commissioners / GSTOs who have been assigned powers u/s 54 of DGST Act, to
issue refund order after obtaining prior approval of Zonal in-charge i.e. Jt.
Commissioner / Addl. Commissioner / Spl. Commissioner, where amount claimed (of
excess tax paid) is more than Rs. 10 lakhs but less than Rs. 50 lakhs;
Similarly, in case of amount above Rs. 50 lakhs, prior approval of Refund
Approval Committee shall be required : Delhi Govt. Orders
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment