Bangalore ITAT rejects
assessee-individual’s claim of ‘exempt’ long term capital gains (‘LTCG’) of Rs.
42 lakh arising on sale of ‘penny stocks’ during AY 2015-16, upholds AO’s stand
that the LTCG booked by assessee were bogus and the gains were assessable as
‘business income’; Rejects assessee’s stand that the genuineness of LTCG claim
cannot be doubted since the contract notes were placed on record and the
payment were made through cheques identifying the company whose shares were
transacted; Upon examining the financials of the company, ITAT observes that
the financial worth of the company was very meager and not worth to be invested
in, remarks that “With such financials, we are unable to understand how there
can be manifold increase in the shares.”; Further observes that taking
cognizance of BSE websites, money control website, investigation wing, SEBI
reports, AO had noted that the price of these shares saw phenomenal rise and
were constantly traded near the circuit limit (of 5%) so as to avail maximum
price rise without hitting and triggering the circuit limit, and thereby avoid
surveillance by the Stock Exchange Regulator; ITAT concludes that Revenue has
brought sufficient material on record to demonstrate that unaccounted money was
introduced in the books through LTCG by circuitous means.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment