Mumbai ITAT quashes
revision u/s 263 made by Pr.CIT on the grounds that there was no nexus between
fictitious capital assets purchase & subsequent routing back as share
capital in assessee Group; Notes that Pr.CIT had initiated revisionary
proceedings on 4 grounds – allowance of bogus depreciation for the purpose of
115JB, acceptance of the withdrawal claims for deprecation without referring to
the schedule of assets, non-consideration of addition of bogus share capital
u/s 68 and AO not ordering a special audit/ rejecting the books of accounts;
Notes that AO had consciously not disallowed the depreciation amount from the
computation of book profits u/s. 115JB and had applied his mind in doing so,
also holds that no addition u/s 68 could be made as assessee had explained the
scam entries and all details were available during assessment proceedings
itself; Opines that it was a clearly & legally permissible view that inflow
in the form of bogus capital was related to the fictitious capital purchased
coming from the same source; Also dismisses Pr.CIT’s ground to reject the books
of accounts stating that the addition on account of bogus deprecation withdrawn
would itself come under ‘cloud’ as there would be no case of making further
additions based upon the figures of the same books; Observing that no material
pertaining to introduction of share capital from other sources had been found
in the search or as a result of investigation or on record, ITAT concludes that
there was no reason or any justification on the part of the AO to further make
detailed enquiry for the source of share capital:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recent Landmark GST Judgments: A Comprehensive Overview
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1. 11.06.2026 GST ...
-
The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has brought significant changes to the pre-deposit framework for...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
With the government making Aadhaar Card ( unique identification card ) mandatory in procuring LPG connections, issuing passports, sale or...
-
This is to update you on procedure prescribed by the Office of the Development Commissioner, Karnataka Sub Zone (the “Office”) to be foll...
-
Introduction Employee welfare is a cornerstone of corporate responsibility, and gratuity forms a critical part of the social security benefi...
-
MARRIAGE EXPENSES - POWERS OF I.T. AUTHORITIES In the recent past the Income Tax Department has been concentrating on collecting informat...
-
The provision of a corporate guarantee, where one company pledges to cover the financial obligations of another (often a subsidiary or affil...
No comments:
Post a Comment