The authorities seems to have asked the taxpayers reporting income from sales of securities in their Financials, to reverse part of the common ITC u/s 17(3) considering the same as an exempt supply The definition of exempt supply uGST means supply of any goods/services which attracts nil rate of tax/wholly exempt from tax and includes non-taxable supply (NTS) NTS is further defined as a supply of goods or services or both which is not leviable to tax uGST Hence, an income to fall under the exempt/NT supply should either be a supply of goods or services "goods” uGST means every kind of movable property other than money and securities... “services” uGST means anything other than goods, money and securities 'Securities' as can be seen above, gets excluded both from the definition of 'goods' & 'services' Merely because there is a mention in Rule 45 that the value of an exempt supply in case of 'securities' shall be taken as 1% of its sale value, will there be an obligation to reverse ITC?? Reference may also be drawn from Hon'ble CESTAT ruling agreeing to the assessee's contention that the income from investments in Mutual Funds may not fall under the ambit of 6(3) reversals as its not the business income of the assessee
Monday, 16 December 2019
No reversal of common ITC on Income from Securities?
The authorities seems to have asked the taxpayers reporting income from sales of securities in their Financials, to reverse part of the common ITC u/s 17(3) considering the same as an exempt supply The definition of exempt supply uGST means supply of any goods/services which attracts nil rate of tax/wholly exempt from tax and includes non-taxable supply (NTS) NTS is further defined as a supply of goods or services or both which is not leviable to tax uGST Hence, an income to fall under the exempt/NT supply should either be a supply of goods or services "goods” uGST means every kind of movable property other than money and securities... “services” uGST means anything other than goods, money and securities 'Securities' as can be seen above, gets excluded both from the definition of 'goods' & 'services' Merely because there is a mention in Rule 45 that the value of an exempt supply in case of 'securities' shall be taken as 1% of its sale value, will there be an obligation to reverse ITC?? Reference may also be drawn from Hon'ble CESTAT ruling agreeing to the assessee's contention that the income from investments in Mutual Funds may not fall under the ambit of 6(3) reversals as its not the business income of the assessee
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Navigating the Complexities of GST Pre-deposit Requirements Before GSTAT
The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has brought significant changes to the pre-deposit framework for...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Issue before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Whether the phrase “paid up capital and general reserves” should be defined as “Ne...
-
Introduction Employee welfare is a cornerstone of corporate responsibility, and gratuity forms a critical part of the social security benefi...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1. 11.06.2026 GST ...
-
In the complex landscape of India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST), the tax treatment of non-compete fees has emerged as a critical area f...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Capital gains taxation on immovable property under the Income-tax Act, 1961 often turns on a deceptively simple question: when is a proper...
-
Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) is generally not applicable to interchange fees, payment gateway charges, or the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR)...
-
The newly enacted Income Tax Act, 2025, marks a significant step toward simplification by consolidating multiple presumptive taxation sche...
-
Introduction The law relating to companies is laid down in Companies Act, 2013 and the rules made thereunder and t...
No comments:
Post a Comment