Tuesday, 20 March 2012

S. 47(iv) relief not available if holding co and nominees hold 100% of subsidiary

In Re RST (AAR)



The applicant, a German company, held 99.99% of the shareholding of an Indian company. The rest of the shares were held by other companies as nominees of the applicant. The Indian company proposed a buy back of shares u/s 77A of the Companies Act which would have resulted in transfer of shares of the Indian company from the applicant to the Indian company at a price to be determined. The applicant claimed that as it and its nominees held 100% of the shares of the Indian company, the exemption conferred by s. 47(iv) on transfers between holding company and 100% subsidiary applied and s. 46A would not apply. HELD by the AAR:

No comments:

ITC is available on GST charged on advances - High Court

  This is to update you about an important decision by Bombay High Court (‘ HC ’ / ‘ Court ’) in the case of L&T IHI Consortium v. UOI,...