S. 2(22) --Non-resident--Indian company closely held by group holding companies in U. S. A., Singapore and Mauritius--Scheme for buy- back of shares by Indian company--Holding company in Mauritius alone accepting offer to buy-back shares--Capital gains claimed not chargeable in India under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement with Mauritius--No dividend distributed by Indian company since introduction of dividend distribution tax--Considerable profits allowed to accumulate over years--Scheme for buy-back accepted only by Mauritius holding company--Device to avoid tax in India--Profits arising to be treated as deemed dividend and taxable in India--Indian company to deduct tax at source on sale proceeds-- A , In re (AAR) . . . 343 ITR 455
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Mere execution of JDA with developer does not trigger capital gains tax in real estate transactions
Recently Bangalore ITAT recently delivered an important ruling clarifying that merely executing a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) does n...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Recent judicial pronouncements across different forums have clarified several important aspects of Indian income tax law, particularly relat...
-
An eminent concern within the GST framework pertains to the entitlement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) concerning expenditures associated with In...
-
The transition to the Income-tax Act, 2025 (ITA 2025) and the accompanying Income-tax Rules, 2026 introduces a significantly overhauled co...
-
Introduction Employee welfare is a cornerstone of corporate responsibility, and gratuity forms a critical part of the social security benefi...
-
The overall effective tax rate of a U.S. multinational corporation may have significant impact on the value of its stock. Therefore, it ...
-
Introduction: India's Green Economy and the Tax Conundrum India stands as a global powerhouse in the fight against climate change, c...
-
In a landmark ruling, the ITAT, Hyderabad Bench, in the case of Amith Vishnaw Gudimela, held that a delay in filing Form-67 cannot be the so...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Delhi High Court held that interest earned on funds temporarily parked in bank deposits during the project setup phase is capital in n...
No comments:
Post a Comment