Toll Global Forwarding India Pvt Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT
Delhi)
CUP method can be
applied by a comparing a pricing formulae, rather than the pricing
quantification in amount. Rule 10AB inserted w.e.f. 01.04.2012 is beneficial in
nature and so retrospective w.e.f. 01.04.2002 The assessee followed the 50:50 business model of sharing residual profits in equal ratio with the service provider at the other end of the transaction i.e. at the consignee’s end in the case of export transaction and at consigner’s end in the case of import transaction. This is a standard practice in the Industry. Even […]
M/s Vijay Veer Singh vs. ITO (ITAT Agra)
Disallowance u/s
184(5) of interest, salary etc paid by a firm to partners cannot be made if the
Best Judgement assessment u/s 144 is due to incompleteness of accounts &
not due to failures referred to in s. 144 The Tribunal had to consider whether disallowances for payments in respect of remuneration and interest on capital paid to the partners, in computation of taxable income of the firm, can be made under section 184(5) when even though assessment is completed under section 144 but the assessee has not committed any such failure as is […]
No comments:
Post a Comment