CBEC releases Form APAF-1
for filing anti-profiteering application before Standing Committee / State
level Screening Committee in terms of Rule 128 of CGST Rules; As per the law,
suppliers of goods & services must pass on any reduction in tax rate or
benefit of ITC to consumers by way of commensurate reduction in prices; If this
is not done, consumer’s interest is protected by National Anti-profiteering
Authority which may order – (a) reduction in prices, (b) return of amount not
passed on with interest @ 18% to recipient, (c) imposition of penalty, and (d)
cancellation of supplier’s registration; Affected consumers can file
application before Standing Committee if profiteering has all-India character
or before State level Screening Committee if profiteering is of local nature;
Format inter alia provides for general information about the applicant, general
information about supplier who has not passed on the benefit, particulars of
goods / services including actual price / value charged per unit pre & post
GST, and comparative per unit actual price / value of like goods / services
charged by other suppliers, as well as details of reduction in tax rate / ITC
benefit; Applicant must give details of input taxes / duties per unit, credit
of which was not available to supplier before implementation of GST : CBEC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment