Kolkata ITAT rules that
payment received by assessee (a US company engaged in manufacturing and sale of
bearings) from its Indian subsidiary (‘TIL’) towards reimbursement of expenses
for the services provided by third parties, not taxable during AYs 2002-03 to
2007-08, as assessee was not the ultimate beneficiary of the sum in question
nor did it render any service to TIL; ITAT notes that expenses claimed as
reimbursement included legal expenses, training, inspection & survey
expenses, airfare, local conveyance, etc., further notes that the actuals
billed by the third parties were paid by the assessee in USA and were later on
reimbursed by TIL to assessee; ITAT remarks that “there is no basis for the AO
to conclude that the payment of reimbursements were in the nature of FTS”,
furthermore ITAT notes that the assessee made no profit on such reimbursements;
Separately, ITAT holds that payment received by assessee for rendering intra
group services to TIL was not taxable, notes that pursuant to agreement with TIL,
assessee agreed to render various services (like management services,
information resources, communication services, engineering services,
Metallurgical services, tool design services, planning and inventory management
services, quality assurance services, etc.) on cost basis to TIL, which were
purely advisory in nature; Further observes that nothing was made available to
TIL, cites MOU to India USA DTAA to hold that consideration for advisory
services cannot be treated as fees for included services (‘FIS’) under Article
12(4)(b), moreover, absent PE in India, ITAT holds that income cannot be taxed
under Article 7 as ‘business profits’ either:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment