Kolkata ITAT rules that
payment received by assessee (a US company engaged in manufacturing and sale of
bearings) from its Indian subsidiary (‘TIL’) towards reimbursement of expenses
for the services provided by third parties, not taxable during AYs 2002-03 to
2007-08, as assessee was not the ultimate beneficiary of the sum in question
nor did it render any service to TIL; ITAT notes that expenses claimed as
reimbursement included legal expenses, training, inspection & survey
expenses, airfare, local conveyance, etc., further notes that the actuals
billed by the third parties were paid by the assessee in USA and were later on
reimbursed by TIL to assessee; ITAT remarks that “there is no basis for the AO
to conclude that the payment of reimbursements were in the nature of FTS”,
furthermore ITAT notes that the assessee made no profit on such reimbursements;
Separately, ITAT holds that payment received by assessee for rendering intra
group services to TIL was not taxable, notes that pursuant to agreement with TIL,
assessee agreed to render various services (like management services,
information resources, communication services, engineering services,
Metallurgical services, tool design services, planning and inventory management
services, quality assurance services, etc.) on cost basis to TIL, which were
purely advisory in nature; Further observes that nothing was made available to
TIL, cites MOU to India USA DTAA to hold that consideration for advisory
services cannot be treated as fees for included services (‘FIS’) under Article
12(4)(b), moreover, absent PE in India, ITAT holds that income cannot be taxed
under Article 7 as ‘business profits’ either:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Kolkata ITAT holds Husband's HUF not falling in the definition of ‘Relative’ of a Wife for gift-tax purposes under Income-tax
Kolkata Tribunal has recently ruled that HUFs cannot be treated as “relatives” under the gift-tax provisions of the Income-tax Act, thereb...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Introduction: ADR’S, GDR’S: These are commonly known as Depository Receipts (‘DR’), a negotiable security issued outside India by a deposi...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
An eminent concern within the GST framework pertains to the entitlement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) concerning expenditures associated with In...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
In Standard Castings Private Limited v. ITO , the Hon’ble ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee’s appeal and set aside a demand that had continu...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
The Approving Panel under General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR), in a landmark direction, has characterized the demerger of Digital, Media a...
-
Introduction Employee welfare is a cornerstone of corporate responsibility, and gratuity forms a critical part of the social security benefi...
-
Key Notes: Transfer pricing relates to the pricing of transactions (such as transfer of goods, services, intangibles and funds) that t...
No comments:
Post a Comment