Mumbai ITAT rules that
payment by Reliance Communication Ltd. (‘assessee’) to non-resident vendors
(based in Australia, Israel, Sweden, Singapore and USA) for supplying software,
not royalty under respective DTAA, holds it as payment for 'copyrighted
article' and not ‘copyright’ itself; Observes that all software license agreements
stipulate that the assessee would be using the software for ‘operation of its
wireless network only’ and it was prevented from utilizing the software for
commercial uses; Further, observes that copyrights in the software were not
transferred to the customers and access to the ‘source codes’ in the software
was not granted to assessee, also there was restriction on copying the
software; Moreover, ITAT observes that in individual supplier's hands (i.e.
Nortel Networks India International Inc. USA, Team Telecom International Ltd.,
Israel, Motorola Inc USA, Alcatel USA International Marketing Inc USA, ZTE
Corporation China and Ericsson AB Sweden), the Courts / Tribunals have held
that sums received by them from assessee for supply of software for wireless
network were not taxable and that the payments could not be termed as royalty;
Cites plethora of rulings including Madras HC ruling in Neyveli Lignite
Corporation Ltd., Delhi HC ruling in Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co.Ltd.,
rejects Revenue’s reliance on Karnataka HC ruling in Samsung, relies on SC
ruling in Pradip J. Mehta to hold that when two views were possible, then the
interpretation in favour of the taxpayer should be adopted:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarifying the manner of gra...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Kerala High Court (HC) 1 upholding the validity of GST notifications 2 extending the t...
No comments:
Post a Comment