SC
upholds Single Judge bench view of HC, provisions of Standards of Weights and
Measures Act, 1976 (SWM Act, 1976), Standards of Weights and Measures
(Enforcement) Act, 1985 (SWM Act, 1985) and Legal Metrology Act, 2009
(LMA, 2009) inapplicable to 'mineral water' sale in hotels and restaurants at
prices above MRP; Notes HC’s Division Bench observation that Single Judge Bench
judgment to the effect that charging prices in excess of printed MRP does not
violate provisions of SWM Act, shall not be enforceable in respect of
provisions of LMA, 2009 and same needs to be adjudicated in de-novo proceedings
under the new Act; Elucidates that, object of LMA, 2009 is only to do away with
1976 and 1985 Acts and combine provisions into one enactment to make the law
simple and bring in transparency, moreover, despite changes made by
46thConstitutional amendment introducing Article 366(29A), position qua ‘sale’
in LMA 2009 / Rules remains exactly the same; Remarks, definition of “sale”
contained in both Acts demonstrates that composite indivisible agreements for
supply of services and food and drinks would not come within the purview of
either enactment since the object is something quite different; SC also rejects
Revenue’s reliance on definition of ‘institutional consumer’ contained in Rules
and contention that hotels would be under the coverage of LMA, 2009 : SC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarifying the manner of gra...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Kerala High Court (HC) 1 upholding the validity of GST notifications 2 extending the t...
No comments:
Post a Comment