Delhi HC begins final
hearing on the question of constitutionality of Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act
which limits transitional credit on goods in stock, to a period of 1 year;
As per the petitioners, since credit is not allowed of stock prior to June 30,
2016, the conditions stipulated under said section r/w Rule 117(4)(a)(iv) of
CGST Rules are arbitrary, unreasonable and in violation of Articles 14 and
19(1)(g) of Constitution; Advocate Tarun Gulati explains to the Court how
assessees having valid documents are placed at a disadvantage vis-a-vis those
who do not have invoices and still get reduced credit on account of proviso to
Section 140(3); HC lists the matter for further hearing on May 1.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
ITAT: Property Received on Family Trust Dissolution Qualifies as ‘Devolution’, Long-Term Capital Gains Tax Applies
Under income tax law, when a capital asset is acquired by way of succession, inheritance or devolution, the cost of acquisition is deemed to...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Recent judicial pronouncements across different forums have clarified several important aspects of Indian income tax law, particularly relat...
-
An eminent concern within the GST framework pertains to the entitlement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) concerning expenditures associated with In...
-
The transition to the Income-tax Act, 2025 (ITA 2025) and the accompanying Income-tax Rules, 2026 introduces a significantly overhauled co...
-
Introduction Employee welfare is a cornerstone of corporate responsibility, and gratuity forms a critical part of the social security benefi...
-
The overall effective tax rate of a U.S. multinational corporation may have significant impact on the value of its stock. Therefore, it ...
-
Introduction: India's Green Economy and the Tax Conundrum India stands as a global powerhouse in the fight against climate change, c...
-
In a landmark ruling, the ITAT, Hyderabad Bench, in the case of Amith Vishnaw Gudimela, held that a delay in filing Form-67 cannot be the so...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Delhi High Court held that interest earned on funds temporarily parked in bank deposits during the project setup phase is capital in n...
No comments:
Post a Comment