HC holds that show cause
notice is mandatory for determining the disputed tax, interest and penalty and
same cannot be collected for 5 years without alleging omission / commission of
willful suppression, fraud, misrepresentation with intent to evade tax as
enumerated under the proviso to Section 73(1) of Finance Act; Notes that
pursuant to audit, the assessee, a cooperative bank, had provisionally paid
CENVAT credit under protest along with interest and penalty; Rejects Revenue’s
plea that no show cause notice is necessary when the assessee has paid tax and
penalty upon ascertainment by Audit Enquiry Officer before service of notice
u/s 73(1) of the Act; Referring to CBEC Instruction dated August 18, 2015 and
provisions of Section 73(3), HC remarks, “extended period of limitation of five
years is available only in cases where the omissions or commissions enumerated
in proviso to Section 73(1) are alleged”; Relying on SC rulings, HC also
quashes levy of penalty stating that show cause notice is mandatory where
Section 78(1) is invoked : Karnataka HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment