Delhi ITAT upholds
taxation of consideration for providing SAP/CAD software related support
as FTS under Article 13(4)(a), being ancillary and subsidiary to the enjoyment
of the right / property for which royalty was received by assessee (a UK
co., JCBE), clarifies that ‘make available’ clause under Article 13(4)(c) is
not applicable; ITAT notes that in earlier years, assessee had entered into
bilateral agreement under which it used to receive royalty from JCB India
(Indian subsidiary) for licensing the technology with an exclusive right to
manufacture and market, however, during relevant AY, assessee entered into a
Tripartite Agreement whereby the technology was sub-licensed by assessee to JCB
investments, and the royalty paid by JCB India was routed through JCB
Investments; Thus noting that entire royalty amount was passed on to assessee
through JCB Investments less 0.5%, ITAT holds JCB Investments as a pass through
entity, remarks that "Substance will rule over
form", observes that except for this routing of royalty through JCB
Investments, all the terms and conditions of the agreement between the assessee
and JCB India including secondment of assessee's employee to JCB India for
rendering of services; Rejects assessee’s stand that co-ordinate bench ruling
holding JCB India a Service PE of assessee cannot be applied in present facts,
observes that there is no difference in the facts and circumstances except for
the tripartite vs. bilateral arrangement; Further follows co-ordinate bench
ruling to hold that royalty was not effectively connected to PE in India,
therefore, cannot be considered under Article 13(6), but should be taxed as
royalty / FTS under Article 13 itself:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Kolkata ITAT holds Husband's HUF not falling in the definition of ‘Relative’ of a Wife for gift-tax purposes under Income-tax
Kolkata Tribunal has recently ruled that HUFs cannot be treated as “relatives” under the gift-tax provisions of the Income-tax Act, thereb...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Introduction: ADR’S, GDR’S: These are commonly known as Depository Receipts (‘DR’), a negotiable security issued outside India by a deposi...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
An eminent concern within the GST framework pertains to the entitlement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) concerning expenditures associated with In...
-
In Standard Castings Private Limited v. ITO , the Hon’ble ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee’s appeal and set aside a demand that had continu...
-
Introduction Employee welfare is a cornerstone of corporate responsibility, and gratuity forms a critical part of the social security benefi...
-
The Approving Panel under General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR), in a landmark direction, has characterized the demerger of Digital, Media a...
-
Key Notes: Transfer pricing relates to the pricing of transactions (such as transfer of goods, services, intangibles and funds) that t...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
No comments:
Post a Comment