SC issues notice to Revenue
in appeal against Delhi CESTAT decision which confirmed excise duty demand on
HR coils that were cut away during manufacture of MS spirally welded pipes;
While affirming the adjudication order, CESTAT had rejected assessee’s claim
that slitting of HR coils was a separate process which did not amount to
manufacture; Appreciating the process of manufacture of spirally welded pipes,
CESTAT had noted that cutting away of uneven edge of HR coils could not be
considered as independent process inasmuch as it was process carried out by way
of preparation in continuous process leading to finished product, viz. pipes;
There was no dispute that pieces of HR coils which were cut away were nothing
but scrap, it had to be considered as emerging in the manufacture of finished
product only and therefore, the same was liable to excise duty; CESTAT had also
rejected assessee’s claim of benefit under Notification No. 89/95-CE which
exempted waste and scrap arising in course of manufacture of exempted goods,
observing that while assessee claimed exemption under Notification No.
6/2006-CE to clear pipes, it also cleared goods on payment of excise duty :
SC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
P&H HC holds exporter eligible for refund of interest paid under Rule 96A on subsequent realisation of export proceeds
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Punjab & Haryana High Court (HC) 1 on the validity of paragraph 4.6 of Circular No. ...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
E very non-resident individual or organisation should obtain a Permanent Account Number (PAN) number if they receive an income and...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
No comments:
Post a Comment