The intermediary service has been a controversial subject in cross
border trade, since the days of Service
Tax. The foremost
controversy is on the outbound
leg, as in if the services qualify as ‘intermediary services’, the
place of supply becomes ‘the location of supplier of services’, and therefore ousting the services from the purview
of export of services [Section 2 (6)
of the IGST Act].
While the entire definition is ambiguous and pending constitutional litmus, the definition contains an inter alia exclusion of ‘own account’, which if applied correctly could provide a window of opportunity to various players to preserve the export status. The CBIC vide Circular No. 159/15/2021-GST dated September 20, 2021 (‘the Circular’) tried to provide certain clarity, but there are still gaps that need to be covered. In this backdrop, this article examines the ‘own account exclusion’.