This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabricated buildings (PFBs) owned by mobile service providers (MSPs) and passive infrastructure support service providers.
Earlier, Bombay High Court (HC) [2] disallowed credit on the above
items on the premise that the items do not qualify as "capital goods"
or "inputs". Subsequently, Delhi HC [3] rendered a
divergent ruling and allowed credit on the same. The matter reached SC.
The key observations of the SC are:
- Mobile
towers are an essential part of the "Base Transceiver Station"
(BTS) and antenna forming an integrated telecom system. It provides
necessary stability for antennas and is crucial for the transmission and
reception of radio signals.
- The
attachment of towers to earth does not inherently classify them as
immovable property. If the attachment is temporary, and the items can be
dismantled without damage, they are treated as movable and hence, “goods”.
- Further,
mobile towers and PFBs serve as accessories to antennas and BTS, which
fall under "capital goods". Hence, such towers and PFBs are also
to be treated as “capital goods”.
- Alternatively,
under Rule 2(k) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, "input" includes
any "good" used to provide a taxable output service, with no
additional conditions. Thus, items like towers and PFBs used in providing
telecom services are "inputs”.
Basis above, SC set aside the ruling of Bombay HC and upheld the decision of
Delhi HC, confirming that MSPs and other passive infrastructure support service
providers are entitled to claim CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and PFBs.
Comments
- For
pending cases under the erstwhile regime where CENVAT credit was reversed
under protest, businesses may explore claiming refund of the same basis SC
ruling.
- Under
GST, ITC is not available on construction of immovable property except for
plant and machinery. Further, telecom towers have been specifically
excluded from the ambit of plant and machinery. Industry may now evaluate
whether ratio of this ruling can be applied under GST to avail ITC.
- Analogy
of the ruling may also be relevant for determining ITC eligibility on
transmission towers, railway sidings, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment