Delhi ITAT deletes Rs.
1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that
set off of non-refundable entry fee paid by group co. (UW) to DoT in 2008,
against the fresh spectrum fee payable by assessee towards allocation of
telecom licenses cannot be regarded as 'transfer' u/s 2(47); Assessee and
Unitech Wireless (Tamilnadu) Pvt. Ltd (UW) are both part of the Norwegian based
Telenor group, assessee had acquired fresh telecom licenses for a spectrum fee
of Rs. 4018 cr. in November, 2012, and had requested DoT to consider the set
off of entry fee of Rs 1658.57 cr. already paid by UW in 2008 for grant of 22
unified access service licenses (‘UASL’), which were then quashed by SC;
Subsequently in December 2012, assessee acquired UW’s business on going concern
basis and entered into business transfer agreement (BTA) and Actionable Claim
Agreement whereby UW transferred all the rights, claims, other rights against
the DoT including the payment of license fee for consideration of Rs. 100 cr.;
Rejects Revenue’s stand that the right acquired by assessee under the
actionable claim agreement constituted a ‘capital asset’ u/s. 2(14) and that
the said right was exercised by assessee in March, 2014, being the date on
which the set off was allowed by DoT; Further rejects Revenue’s stand that
consequent to the set off, capital asset acquired by assessee was extinguished
and thus there was a ‘transfer’ u/s. 2(47) of a short term capital asset (being
held for a period less than 36 months); ITAT holds that 'right' which is not
enforceable by law, cannot be regarded as a 'capital asset', thus holds that
assessee had not acquired any capital asset from UW under the Actionable Claim
agreement since UW did not hold such asset at any point of time.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GST Not Leviable on Transfer of Leasehold Rights of MIDC Plots: SC Dismisses Revenue’s SLP
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
-
· Legal Framework: Section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides the legal framework for the partition of a Hindu Undivided...
-
New utility for generation of Form 16A in pdf format provided by https://www.tdscpc.gov.in is very light and is sized only 8.43 MB while ...
-
1. Introduction Cross-border investment structures often employ intermediate holding companies in jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands. A c...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Issue before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Whether the phrase “paid up capital and general reserves” should be defined as “Ne...
-
Introduction Employee welfare is a cornerstone of corporate responsibility, and gratuity forms a critical part of the social security benefi...
-
Facts Saptarshi Ghosh (the tax payer) was a salaried employee of TCS Limited (employer), an Indian company. He was on deputation to the U...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
In the complex landscape of India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST), the tax treatment of non-compete fees has emerged as a critical area f...
-
The newly enacted Income Tax Act, 2025, marks a significant step toward simplification by consolidating multiple presumptive taxation sche...
No comments:
Post a Comment