Visakhapatnam ITAT rejects
taxability u/s. 56(2)(vii)(c) in the hands of assessee-individual for share
allotment under 'rights issue' in a family owned company at less than fair
market value during AY 2013-14; The entire shareholding in a closely held
company was held by assessee alongwith 7 of his close relatives [as defined
under explanation to 56(2)(vii)(c)], during subject AY, the company issued the
equity shares on rights basis for which only the assessee had applied and the
other relatives did not choose to subscribe for the rights issue; Rejects
Revenue’s stand that since there is no relation between the company and the
assessee there is no case for invoking the explanation of ‘relative’ to exempt
the assessee from taxing the excess fair market value; ITAT observes that
though the assessee had received the excess shares, renouncement was from the
close relatives, ITAT rules that “surrender of the rights of the close
relatives in favour of another close relative is covered for exemption u/s
56(2)(vii)(c) of the Act,”; ITAT concludes that the transactions between close
relatives are outside the scope of application of 56(2)(vii)(c) and should not
be seen as introducing black money or evasion of the tax, cites Chennai ITAT
ruling in Vaani Estates Pvt. Ltd., Karnataka HC ruling in R. Nagaraja Rao,
Madras HC ruling in Kay Arr Enterprises.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Commission Paid to Overseas Sourcing Agents Not Taxable as FTS; No Witholding Obligation
Delhi ITAT held that commission paid by an exporter to an overseas sourcing agent for procurement of export orders and follow-up on realis...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
No comments:
Post a Comment