Visakhapatnam ITAT rejects
taxability u/s. 56(2)(vii)(c) in the hands of assessee-individual for share
allotment under 'rights issue' in a family owned company at less than fair
market value during AY 2013-14; The entire shareholding in a closely held
company was held by assessee alongwith 7 of his close relatives [as defined
under explanation to 56(2)(vii)(c)], during subject AY, the company issued the
equity shares on rights basis for which only the assessee had applied and the
other relatives did not choose to subscribe for the rights issue; Rejects
Revenue’s stand that since there is no relation between the company and the
assessee there is no case for invoking the explanation of ‘relative’ to exempt
the assessee from taxing the excess fair market value; ITAT observes that
though the assessee had received the excess shares, renouncement was from the
close relatives, ITAT rules that “surrender of the rights of the close
relatives in favour of another close relative is covered for exemption u/s
56(2)(vii)(c) of the Act,”; ITAT concludes that the transactions between close
relatives are outside the scope of application of 56(2)(vii)(c) and should not
be seen as introducing black money or evasion of the tax, cites Chennai ITAT
ruling in Vaani Estates Pvt. Ltd., Karnataka HC ruling in R. Nagaraja Rao,
Madras HC ruling in Kay Arr Enterprises.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment