Delhi ITAT rules that there
is no PE of assessee (a UAE co. engaged in providing solutions for subsea
off-shore construction industry) on account of the grouting activities carried
out in India during AY 2007-08; Accepts assessee’s stand that the grouting activities
fall within the construction activity as contemplated in specific provision of
Article 5(2)(h), and since the number of days spent in India was less than the
stipulated period of 9 months, there was no PE trigger for the assessee in
India; Revenue had argued that Article 5(1) squarely applies to the assessee,
further Revenue had argued that the assessee has equipment PE in India, lastly
it was also contended that even movables place of business may constitute a PE
despite they are temporary in location; Firstly, ITAT applies the maxim,
“generalia specialibus non deroganf' i.e, a general provision would not be
applicable when specific provision is there, next ITAT clarifies that merely
because grouting is not a simple masonry work and involves complex aspects, it
does not take it out of the construction activities as mentioned in Article
5(2)(h), “…and any further classification [as done by the Revenue] would amount
to rewriting DTAA.”; Lastly, rejects Revenue’s stand that since the assessee
indulged in on-going projects, 9 months stipulation cannot be applied, states
that PE determination has to be made for each AY and with reference to DTAA
provision.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment