Delhi HC confirms ITAT
order holding that the amount received by assessee (engaged in providing basic
telecom services) on sale of prepaid cards to the extent of unutilized talk
time did not accrue as income in the year of sale i.e. AYs 2003-04, 2004-05
& 2009-10; Approves assessee’s mode of recognizing revenue on prepaid cards
on the basis of actual usage and carrying forward unutilized amount outstanding
on the prepaid cards to the next year in view of the matching principles for
revenue recognition as enshrined in the Accounting Standards, rejects Revenue’s
stand that assessee must account for the entire amount; However, HC states that
Revenue’s contention that the prepaid amount once paid and received by assessee
was forgone by the subscriber and accordingly appropriated by assessee is
substantially correct; At the same time, HC clarifies that “the payment was an
advance and was subject to the respondent-assessee providing basic telecom
service as promised, failing which the unutilized amount was required to be
refunded to the pre-paid subscribers” under the ordinary law of contract or
special enactments like the Consumer Protection Act; Lastly, HC rules that “unutilized
amount when the prepaid card lapses has to be treated as income or receipt of
the respondent-assessee on the date when the card had lapsed.”:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment