Delhi ITAT upholds CIT(A)’s
order disallowing a portion of the conference expenses relating to amount spent
on party and dinner, media event, purchase of expensive watches, jackets,
T-shirts, etc. by assessee (a Law firm) during AY 2010-11; Regarding expenses
on distribution of T-shirts, caps and jackets having assessee firm’s logo on
annual day celebration, ITAT remarks that“nothing is brought on record as how
the distribution of the merchandise among the counsels has served the business
purpose of the assessee firm, which is firm of the Advocates.”, further notes
no evidence of distribution was submitted; Likewise, for dinner / video
coverage expenses in relation to a party hosted to celebrate assessee-firm’s
achievements in which all clients and counsels of the firm along with various
dignitaries were invited, ITAT states that, “The assessee has not brought on
record anything to support that the dinner hosted was for furtherance of the
business interest.”; Also, ITAT disallows sponsorship fee paid by assessee for
the event “PEI India Forum” for enhancing its visibility and recognition, holds
the same was in violation of the Bar Council rules [whereby Indian Law firms
are not allowed to advertise their practice in the market] , thereby triggering
Explanation 1 to Sec. 37; With respect to the expensive watches distributed as
rewards to two employees for their exceptional work, ITAT observes that assessee
did not provide any rationale of watches distribution to only two such
employees:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment