Saturday, 1 December 2018

TAT Order Voidable For One Day Delay


Kaushik N. Tanna vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

S. 254(1)/ Rule 34(5)(c): An order passed by the Tribunal even one day after the prescribed period of 90 days from the date of hearing causes prejudice to the assessee and is liable to be recalled and the appeal posted for fresh hearing

Since, in the present case, the order has been pronounced one day beyond 90 days prescribed under the Rules, we respectfully following the order of the Hon’ble High Court discussed above, recall the order dated 09.11.2017 without going into the merits of the other grounds raised in the application, for fresh hearing

No comments:

Calcutta High Court Reaffirms: Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence in Share Capital Cases

In   PCIT v. Shipra Enclave (P.) Ltd. , the Calcutta High Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, holding that share capital additions cannot ...