Mumbai ITAT quashes
revision u/s 263 made by Pr.CIT on the grounds that there was no nexus between
fictitious capital assets purchase & subsequent routing back as share
capital in assessee Group; Notes that Pr.CIT had initiated revisionary
proceedings on 4 grounds – allowance of bogus depreciation for the purpose of
115JB, acceptance of the withdrawal claims for deprecation without referring to
the schedule of assets, non-consideration of addition of bogus share capital
u/s 68 and AO not ordering a special audit/ rejecting the books of accounts;
Notes that AO had consciously not disallowed the depreciation amount from the
computation of book profits u/s. 115JB and had applied his mind in doing so,
also holds that no addition u/s 68 could be made as assessee had explained the
scam entries and all details were available during assessment proceedings
itself; Opines that it was a clearly & legally permissible view that inflow
in the form of bogus capital was related to the fictitious capital purchased
coming from the same source; Also dismisses Pr.CIT’s ground to reject the books
of accounts stating that the addition on account of bogus deprecation withdrawn
would itself come under ‘cloud’ as there would be no case of making further
additions based upon the figures of the same books; Observing that no material
pertaining to introduction of share capital from other sources had been found
in the search or as a result of investigation or on record, ITAT concludes that
there was no reason or any justification on the part of the AO to further make
detailed enquiry for the source of share capital:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment