Mumbai ITAT rules that the
Industrial Promotion Subsidy (IPS) received by assessee (a subsidiary of
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.) during AY 2012-13 constitutes a non-taxable
capital receipt; Noting that assessee had started commercial production in
January, 2010, AO had held that the subsidy received was on revenue account as
the object of the subsidy received after the commencement of production was to
enable assessee to run the business more profitably in lieu of the
industry/unit set up by it in a particular area; Rejecting Revenue's stand,
ITAT refers to the object of the scheme under which assessee was granted
subsidy, notes that the incentive was granted not for carrying on day-to-day
business of the unit more profitably but to provide impetus to the process of
dispersal of industries to backward areas; Furthermore clarifies that the sales
tax payment is only a yardstick to determine the quantum of incentive and
cannot be construed as to mitigate the operational cost of the business;
Distinguishes Revenue’s reliance on SC ruling in Sahney Steel & Press Works
Ltd. and Delhi HC ruling in Bhushan Steels & Strips Ltd. On facts, relies
on SC ruling in Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment