CBDT issues final
notification u/s. 115JG(1) specifying the conditions to be fulfilled upon
conversion of Indian Branch of foreign bank into Indian subsidiary company and
also specifying modifications, exceptions, in applicability of certain
provisions of the Act to such conversion; Apart from the conditions specified
in draft notification for availing capital gains exemption that all assets /
liabilities of Indian Branch are taken over by subsidiary, foreign co. receives
consideration only by way of share allotment, foreign co./ its nominees hold
whole of the share capital of the subsidiary, conversion is in accordance with
RBI guidelines, the final notification additionally stipulates that all assets
and liabilities of Indian branch are transferred at book values and any change
in value of assets consequent to their revaluation shall be ignored; Likewise,
the final notification specifies two additional ‘exceptions, modifications and
adaptations’, viz. 1) Sec. 56(2)(x) shall not apply to the transaction of receipt
of shares in the Indian subsidiary company by the foreign company in
consequence of the conversion and 2) the provisions of 35DDA [relating
amortisation of expenditure incurred under VRS] shall be, as far as may be,
apply to the Indian subsidiary company, as they would have applied to the
Indian branch, if the conversion had not taken place; The conditions relating
to unabsorbed depreciation, losses set-off / carry forward, tax credit are
largely similar to those proposed under draft notification; CBDT also amends
Rule 8AA to provide for determination of the holding period for the capital
asset which became the property of the Indian subsidiary co. in consequence to
conversion u/s. 115JG(1), states that the period for which the asset was held
by the Indian branch and by the previous owner [who acquired the capital asset
by a mode referred to in Sec. 49(1) / Sec. 115JG(1)] shall be included
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment