CBDT issues final
notification u/s. 115JG(1) specifying the conditions to be fulfilled upon
conversion of Indian Branch of foreign bank into Indian subsidiary company and
also specifying modifications, exceptions, in applicability of certain
provisions of the Act to such conversion; Apart from the conditions specified
in draft notification for availing capital gains exemption that all assets /
liabilities of Indian Branch are taken over by subsidiary, foreign co. receives
consideration only by way of share allotment, foreign co./ its nominees hold
whole of the share capital of the subsidiary, conversion is in accordance with
RBI guidelines, the final notification additionally stipulates that all assets
and liabilities of Indian branch are transferred at book values and any change
in value of assets consequent to their revaluation shall be ignored; Likewise,
the final notification specifies two additional ‘exceptions, modifications and
adaptations’, viz. 1) Sec. 56(2)(x) shall not apply to the transaction of receipt
of shares in the Indian subsidiary company by the foreign company in
consequence of the conversion and 2) the provisions of 35DDA [relating
amortisation of expenditure incurred under VRS] shall be, as far as may be,
apply to the Indian subsidiary company, as they would have applied to the
Indian branch, if the conversion had not taken place; The conditions relating
to unabsorbed depreciation, losses set-off / carry forward, tax credit are
largely similar to those proposed under draft notification; CBDT also amends
Rule 8AA to provide for determination of the holding period for the capital
asset which became the property of the Indian subsidiary co. in consequence to
conversion u/s. 115JG(1), states that the period for which the asset was held
by the Indian branch and by the previous owner [who acquired the capital asset
by a mode referred to in Sec. 49(1) / Sec. 115JG(1)] shall be included
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GST Not Leviable on Transfer of Leasehold Rights of MIDC Plots: SC Dismisses Revenue’s SLP
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
-
· Legal Framework: Section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides the legal framework for the partition of a Hindu Undivided...
-
New utility for generation of Form 16A in pdf format provided by https://www.tdscpc.gov.in is very light and is sized only 8.43 MB while ...
-
1. Introduction Cross-border investment structures often employ intermediate holding companies in jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands. A c...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Issue before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Whether the phrase “paid up capital and general reserves” should be defined as “Ne...
-
Introduction Employee welfare is a cornerstone of corporate responsibility, and gratuity forms a critical part of the social security benefi...
-
Facts Saptarshi Ghosh (the tax payer) was a salaried employee of TCS Limited (employer), an Indian company. He was on deputation to the U...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
In the complex landscape of India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST), the tax treatment of non-compete fees has emerged as a critical area f...
-
The newly enacted Income Tax Act, 2025, marks a significant step toward simplification by consolidating multiple presumptive taxation sche...
No comments:
Post a Comment