Pune ITAT rules that
service of notice u/s. 143(2) on the manager of assessee-firm and not partners,
would not invalidate the assessment proceedings for AY 2010-11; Observes that
though the assessee had raised objection before the AO during the course of
assessment proceedings itself that the notice was not properly served, the
authorized representative (AR) of the assessee appearing before the AO gave his
‘no objection’ for furthering the assessment proceedings; ITAT remarks that
“the proviso to section 292BB of the Act, which was triggered by raising an
initial objection before the AO, was given a go by and got set to rest by the
ld. AR not objecting to such objection in terms of order sheet entry..”; ITAT
rules that once the proviso is held to be inapplicable, the main provision of
Sec. 292BB gets magnetized, which deems proper service of notice on assessee;
Further clarifies that once an assessee empowers his AR to appear in the income
tax proceedings and undertakes to ratify his acts, there is no need to ignore
any concession made by the ld. AR and personally call upon the assessee to make
concession in every case, distinguishes assessee’s reliance on SC ruling in
Himalayan Cooperative Group Housing Society on facts:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment