AIF Scheme Eligible for Pass-Through Exemption Despite Separate PAN

 In a recent ruling, the Mumbai Tribunal held that a scheme floated under a SEBI-registered Category II AIF trust can claim pass-through exemption, and such benefit cannot be denied merely because the scheme has a separate PAN while the SEBI registration stands in the name of the parent trust.

Withdrawn IPO Expenses treated as Revenue Expenditure

 The Delhi Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ('Tribunal'), in a recent decision, held that expenses incurred on withdrawn IPO are revenue in nature and that income arising from foreign exchange differences and write-back of provisions qualifies for export-linked deductions.

Background

Gujarat HC – Relief for delay in opting concessional tax regime

 Gujarat High Court has granted relief to a taxpayer by allowing condonation of delay in opting for the new tax regime, holding that genuine and bona fide procedural delays may not result in denial of tax benefits.

Background

Indirect Transfer on Liquidation of a Foreign Holding Company

1. Introduction

Cross-border investment structures often employ intermediate holding companies in jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands. A common corporate restructuring step involves liquidating such a holding entity, which results in the upstream shareholder (for example, a Singapore company) acquiring direct ownership of the underlying subsidiaries—including, potentially, an Indian company.

ITAT Delhi – Cross border Buy-back may Qualify as Corporate Reorganisation whereby Capital Gains Not Taxable in India

 Recently, the Delhi Bench of the ITAT has held that a buy-back of shares within a corporate group can qualify as a “corporate reorganisation” under Article 13(5) of the India–Netherlands DTAA, thereby rendering the resultant capital gains taxable only in the Netherlands and not in India.

Recent Policy Changes Impacting Indian Manufacturing and Exports

 In a series of recent policy and regulatory interventions, the Government has introduced a set of measures aimed at strengthening export competitiveness, easing compliance, and enhancing domestic manufacturing resilience. Together, these measures spanning customs facilitation, import policy, sustainability regulation, and trade support reflect a calibrated policy response balancing trade facilitation, cost competitiveness, domestic industry protection, and sustainability alignment.

Deferred Customs Duty for Manufacturers: EMI Scheme Takes Effect from 1 April 2026

 In a significant move to ease working capital pressures for manufacturers, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), vide Circular No. 08/2026-Customs dated 28.02.2026, has extended the facility of deferred payment of Customs import duty to a new category of importers termed Eligible Manufacturer Importers (EMI), effective from 1^st April 2026. Under this framework, eligible importers can clear goods without upfront payment of Customs duty and instead discharge the duty liability on a consolidated monthly basis, thereby enabling more efficient cash flow management. This reform announced as part of the Union Budget 2026–27, is governed by the Deferred Payment of Import Duty Rules, 2016, is also aimed at expediting Customs clearance of imported goods at ports, airports, and inland container depots.

Interest on Foreign Currency Loan & Corresponding Forex Loss for Strategic Share Acquisition Held Deductible as Revenue Expenditure

 The tax treatment of interest on funds borrowed to acquire shares hinges on a single, crucial distinction: the purpose behind the acquisition.

Landmark ITAT Delhi Ruling: Share Buy-Backs Qualify as "Corporate Reorganization" under India-Netherlands DTAA

 In a significant victory for multinational enterprises and foreign portfolio investors, the Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), via a Third Member ruling, has held that a share buy-back by an Indian subsidiary from its Netherlands-based parent constitutes a “corporate reorganization” under the India-Netherlands Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The decision, pronounced on March 25, 2026, in the case of Huntsman Investment [Netherlands] BV vs. ADIT (Assessment Year 2009-10), sets a powerful precedent on treaty interpretation.

CBDT amends Income Tax Rules to clarify GAAR grandfathering provisions

 On 31 March 2026, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued two Notifications^[1] amending General Anti Avoidance Rules (GAAR) providing grandfathering benefit for income derived from transfer of investments which were made prior to 1 April 2017. The first Notification amends Rule 10U under Income Tax Rules (ITR), 1962 applicable to the erstwhile Income Tax Act (ITA), 1961, whereas the second Notification amends comparable Rule 128 under ITR 2026 applicable to the new ITA 2025 effective from 1 April 2026.

The Notifications state that GAAR provisions shall not apply with respect to any income derived from transfer of investments which were made before 1 April 2017 even though the arrangement, irrespective of the date on which it had been entered into, is not grandfathered.

The amendments to ITR 1962 are effective from 31 March 2026, while those relating to ITR 2026 apply from 1 April 2026.