Wednesday, 8 February 2012

s. 194H TDS: In absence of principal-agent relationship, payment, though called “commission”, not covered

Kotak Securities Limited vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

The assessee obtained a bank guarantee and paid ‘bank guarantee commission’. The AO & CIT (A) took the view that since the payment was characterized as “commission” it fell within the ambit of s. 194H and the assessee ought to have deducted TDS. The assessee was held liable as assessee-in-default u/s 201. On appeal by the assessee, HELD reversing the AO & CIT (A):

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was once
a leisure account it. Glance complicated to far brought agreeable
from you! However, how could we communicate?
Stop by my site ; how to get rid of swollen ankles

Navigating the Complexities of GST Pre-deposit Requirements Before GSTAT

  The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has brought significant changes to the pre-deposit framework for...