Introduction
Employee welfare is a cornerstone of corporate
responsibility, and gratuity forms a critical part of the social security
benefits provided by employers. For private limited companies, one common
question is whether contributions made directly to the Life Insurance
Corporation of India (LIC) under its Group Gratuity Scheme—without creating
a separate gratuity trust—qualify for deduction under the Income-tax Act,
1961. This issue primarily revolves around the interplay of Section 36(1)(v),
Section 40A(7), and Section 43B.
This article examines statutory provisions, relevant case laws, CBDT circulars, and judicial interpretation to clarify the deductibility of such payments.
Statutory Framework
- Section
36(1)(v)
- Allows deduction for contributions to an approved
gratuity fund created under an irrevocable trust for the exclusive
benefit of employees.
- Key conditions: (i) irrevocable trust, (ii) approval
under Part C of the Fourth Schedule, (iii) employer cannot exercise
control over the fund.
- Section
40A(7)
- Restricts deduction for gratuity provisions.
- Deduction is allowed only if:
- (a) it is for an approved gratuity fund, or
- (b) the provision relates to gratuity that has become
payable during the year.
- Section
43B(b)
- Overrides other provisions.
- Deduction for contributions to gratuity, provident, or
superannuation funds is permitted only on actual payment,
regardless of the method of accounting.
Issues Faced by Companies Without a Trust
Private companies often prefer paying contributions directly
to LIC under its Group Gratuity Scheme, bypassing the complexity of setting up
and managing an independent gratuity trust. However, this raises concerns:
- Does
such a payment satisfy the “approved gratuity fund” requirement under
Section 36(1)(v)?
- Can
it be allowed under Section 43B even without formal trust approval?
- Is
the deduction disallowed under Section 40A(7) if no trust exists?
Judicial Precedents
1. CIT v. Textool Co. Ltd. (Supreme Court, 2013)
- Facts:
Employer paid directly to LIC towards Group Gratuity Scheme.
- Held:
Deduction allowed. Once paid to LIC and employer lost control, the
condition of irrevocable transfer was satisfied.
- Principle:
Substance prevails over form—direct contribution to LIC scheme suffices
where employer has no control over funds.
2. Andaman & Nicobar State Co-operative Bank v. DCIT
(ITAT Kolkata, AY 2014–15)
- Deduction
allowed for LIC group gratuity payments.
- Emphasized
that employer lost control once funds were transferred.
3. Allahabad High Court (ITA No. 12 of 2015)
- Held
that payment to LIC under group gratuity scheme qualifies as contribution
to an approved gratuity fund in substance.
4. CIT v. Jaipur Thar Gramin Bank (Rajasthan HC, 2017)
- Even
where approval of gratuity fund was pending, deduction allowed since the
payment was exclusively for employees and beyond employer’s control.
5. Narasu’s Spinning Mills v. ACIT (ITAT Chennai, 2016)
- Deduction
permitted for LIC group gratuity contribution, despite pending approval,
provided funds were irrevocably transferred.
CBDT Rules and Circulars
- Rule
101 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 permits gratuity funds to invest in LIC’s Group
Gratuity Scheme. This implicitly recognizes LIC schemes as acceptable
vehicles for gratuity management.
- No
recent CBDT circular (2024–25) directly addresses deduction without a
trust, but departmental practice often follows judicial interpretation.
Interplay of Sections 36(1)(v), 40A(7), and 43B
- Section
36(1)(v)
requires an approved gratuity fund. Technically, payment without an
irrevocable trust may not qualify strictly under this clause.
- Section
40A(7)
disallows mere provisions unless related to an approved fund or gratuity
payable in the year. Thus, provision without payment is not deductible.
- Section
43B(b),
however, allows deduction on actual payment. Courts have
consistently read this provision liberally to permit deductions for
payments to LIC group gratuity schemes, even where a formal trust is
absent, provided:
- Payment is irrevocable,
- Employer has no control,
- Funds are exclusively for employees.
Practical Guidance for Companies
- Deduction
Allowed: If
payment is made directly to LIC under the Group Gratuity Scheme, deduction
is generally available under Section 43B.
- Documentation: Maintain records of LIC policy,
payment vouchers, and terms showing employer’s lack of control.
- Safer
Route: Setting
up an irrevocable gratuity trust and seeking approval under Part C of the
Fourth Schedule ensures seamless compliance.
- Timing
of Payment:
Deduction available only in the year of actual payment (or if paid before
the due date for filing return under Section 139(1)).
Risks and Litigation Issues
- Assessing
Officers may disallow deduction citing lack of approved trust.
- Appeals
may be necessary, relying on Textool (SC) and subsequent ITAT/HC
judgments.
- Pending
approval of gratuity fund has been held not to bar deduction, but
litigation risk remains.
Conclusion
For a private limited company contributing directly to LIC
under its Group Gratuity Scheme without creating a separate trust,
deduction under the Income-tax Act is possible, but it hinges on actual
payment (Section 43B) and judicial interpretations. The Supreme Court in
Textool and subsequent rulings have established that such contributions are
deductible provided the employer irrevocably parts with the money and has no
control over its use.
While technically Section 36(1)(v) requires an approved
gratuity fund, judicial precedents treat LIC-managed schemes as sufficient in
substance. However, for risk-free compliance, creating an irrevocable trust and
obtaining approval remains the most robust approach.
In summary:
- Yes, deduction is allowable on
actual payment to LIC’s group gratuity scheme even without a gratuity
trust, under Section 43B.
- Reliance
may be placed on CIT v. Textool Co. Ltd. (SC) and other ITAT/HC
decisions.
- To
minimize disputes, companies should document irrevocability and employee
exclusivity, and ideally consider creating an approved gratuity trust for
long-term compliance.
No comments:
Post a Comment