This Tax Alert summarizes a ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) in a batch of cases, with the lead case being that of Copal Research Limited, Mauritius (Taxpayer) on the issue of taxability of direct/ indirect transfer of shares in certain Indian companies. In a series of transactions, shares of India and US entities were transferred by Mauritius companies. The Taxpayer had approached the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) which ruled, among other things, that the transaction would not be taxable in India. Against this ruling, the Tax Authority filed a writ petition in HC whereby, HC was required to evaluate implications under the Indirect Transfer Provision (ITP) of the Indian Tax Laws (ITL). ITP taxes sale of shares of an overseas entity if the same derives “substantial” value from underlying assets in India. The HC ruled that the requirement of “substantial value” for ITP is met if the underlying value of Indian assets exceeds 50% of the total value of the overseas entity. Where however, if the underlying value is less than 50% then, there shall be no tax liability. Further, having regard to the facts of the case, the HC held that the corporate veil of the Mauritius companies cannot be pierced for the reason that such entities had independent corporate personality, and business purpose, and was not a device for avoiding Indian tax.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment