Burnt coal residue from
paper manufacturing process classifiable as “coal including coke in all its
form….”, taxable at 4% under U.P. VAT Act as it retains its combustible
properties; HC finds that during AYs 1999-2000, 2000-01 & 2001-02, said
product was taxed at 4% but pursuant to HC decisions in Modi Spinning &
Weaving Mills and British India Corporation Limited, same came to treated as
“unclassified” residual article taxable at 10% from AY 2002-03 onwards;
Observes that in case of Modi Spinning & Weaving Mills, the issue pertained
to taxability of “coal cinder” whereas British India Corporation case dealt
with taxability of “coal ash”, thus these cases cannot be understood or applied
without bearing in mind the particular commodities under consideration therein;
Noting that Revenue had not submitted any evidence to establish that residual
commodity had lost all its combustible properties, HC remarks that “In issues
of classification, the Department cannot be permitted to vacillate unless there
be new material and evidence which may justify or warrant a change in stance”;
Referring to Division Bench decision in District Cooperative Development
Federation Ltd. which held that “coal dust” would classify as “coal” as both
have same combustible properties and similar usage, HC rules in favour of
assessee : Allahabad HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment