Gujarat HC holds that mere
issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) & claiming extended period for processing of
refund u/s. 143(1) would not be sufficient to withhold tax refund for AYs
2015-16 and 2016-17; Assessee (a turnkey projects contractor) had filed tax
returns for both the years declaring high amount of tax losses and claimed tax
refunds arising on account of TDS and for one of years i.e. AY 2015-16, notice
u/s Sec 143(2) was issued but the assessment was not complete; Considering the
financial crunch and liquidity problems, the assessee followed up several times
with the IT Department for the release of the tax refunds, but did not receive
any response after which the assessee decided to approach HC; Noting the
amendments by Finance Act, 2017 and provisions as applicable to the assessee
i.e. post deletion of section 241 of the Act and prior to insertion of section
241A, HC observes that "the Revenue cannot contend that even though no
intimation under sub-section (1) of section 143 was issued within the time
envisaged and no notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 was issued, the
Assessing Officer can sit tight over the refund claimed by the assessee arising
out of the return filed"; HC further adds that "We simply
cannot accept the interpretation of the counsel
for the Revenue that once a notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 is
issued, the suspension of the refund arising out of the return filed by the
assessee would be automatic and till the passing of the order of assessment
under sub-section (3) of section 143"; HC states that it would be 'wholly
inequitable' for the AO to merely sit over the petitioner's request for refund
citing the availability of time upto the last date of framing the assessment
u/s 143(3); Applying the reasonable interpretation of the provisions, HC
observes that AO is expected to take up an expeditious disposal of the
processing of return u/s 143(1) once the assessee requests for release of the
refund and send as an intimation to the assessee if he wishes to withhold the
refund; For AY 2015-16, HC directs AO to complete the process of the assessee's
return u/s 143(1) latest by October 31, 2017 and notes that for AY 2016-17 the
time for processing the return under sub-section (1) of section 143 read with
proviso is not yet over:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment